
Firepro M4100

Radeon HD 6750
Firepro M4100 vs Radeon HD 6750 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Firepro M4100 vs Radeon HD 6750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Firepro M4100 vs Radeon HD 6750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Firepro M4100
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 86W, a 56W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 170mm, a 88mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6750
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌186.7% higher power demand at 86W vs 30W.
- ❌107.3% longer card at 170mm vs 82mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Firepro M4100 vs Radeon HD 6750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Firepro M4100
The Firepro M4100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 670 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

Radeon HD 6750
The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.
Graphics Performance
The Firepro M4100 scores 1,059 and the Radeon HD 6750 reaches 1,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro M4100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Firepro M4100) vs 720 (Radeon HD 6750). Raw compute: 0.5146 TFLOPS (Firepro M4100) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750).
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,059+1% | 1,046 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 720+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5146 TFLOPS | 1.008 TFLOPS+96% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 36+50% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+33% | 72 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Firepro M4100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6750 carries 1 GB. Firepro M4100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro M4100 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6750.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro M4100) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_1)+7% | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Firepro M4100) vs None (Radeon HD 6750). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (Firepro M4100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750).
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Firepro M4100 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 6750's 86W — a 96.6% difference. The Firepro M4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro M4100) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 82mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-65% | 86W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 82mm | 170mm |
| Height | 70mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 35.3+189% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Firepro M4100 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 6750 launched at $109. On MSRP, Firepro M4100 was 100+% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Firepro M4100) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 6750) — the Firepro M4100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Firepro M4100 (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $109 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 9.6 |
| Codename | Mars | Juniper |
| Release | October 16 2013 | January 21 2011 |
| Ranking | #866 | #872 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















