FirePro S7000 vs GeForce RTX 4070

FirePro S7000

2012Core: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz
RTX family
·······

FirePro S7000 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S7000 vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S7000

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,524 vs 26,919).
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 108.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,249 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

  • +495% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $650 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1140.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 495% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 4,524), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while FirePro S7000 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $650 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $1,249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1140.7% (44.9 vs 3.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro S7000 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro S7000

The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro S7000 scores 4,524 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 495%. The FirePro S7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro S7000) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro S7000) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070).

FeatureFirePro S7000GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score
4,524
26,919+495%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
1280
5888+360%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.432 TFLOPS
29.15 TFLOPS+1099%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
80
184+130%
L1 Cache
0.31 MB
5.8 MB+1771%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
36 MB+7100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro S7000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro S7000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro S7000GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7000 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7000) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S7000GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
12 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6X
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
36 MB+7100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (FirePro S7000) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro S7000GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S7000) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro S7000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

FeatureFirePro S7000GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder
VCE 1.0
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder
UVD 4.0
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7000 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The FirePro S7000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7000) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 292mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro S7000GeForce RTX 4070
TDP
150W-25%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-46%
650W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
292mm
304mm
Height
111mm
137mm
Slots
1-67%
3
Temp (Load)
85
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
30.2
134.6+346%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S7000 came in at $1249, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 52% cheaper ($650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (FirePro S7000) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 1147.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro S7000GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP
$1249
$599-52%
Performance per Dollar
3.6
44.9+1147%
Codename
Pitcairn
AD104
Release
August 27 2012
April 12 2023
Ranking
#462
#32

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.