FirePro S7000 vs Tesla K40c

FirePro S7000

2012Core: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K40c

2013Core: 745 MHzBoost: 876 MHz
Similar parts
·

FirePro S7000 vs Tesla K40c Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S7000 vs Tesla K40c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S7000

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $6,450 less on MSRP ($1,249 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 520.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($1,249 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 150W instead of 245W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla K40c

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 516.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $7,699 MSRPvs$1,249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($7,699 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
  • 63.3% higher power demand at 245W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro S7000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (4,524 vs 4,495), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro S7000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S7000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $6,450 cheaper on MSRP at $1,249 vs $7,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 520.4% (3.6 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro S7000 vs Tesla K40c Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro S7000

The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.

NVIDIA

Tesla K40c

The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7000 scores 4,524 and the Tesla K40c reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla K40c uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro S7000) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40c). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro S7000) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c).

FeatureFirePro S7000Tesla K40c
G3D Mark Score
4,524
4,495
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
2880+125%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.432 TFLOPS
5.046 TFLOPS+107%
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
80
240+200%
L1 Cache
320 KB+33%
240 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1.5 MB+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S7000Tesla K40c
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K40c carries 2 GB. FirePro S7000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7000 and 64-bit on the Tesla K40c. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7000) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) — the Tesla K40c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S7000Tesla K40c
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1.5 MB+200%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (FirePro S7000) vs 11_0 (Tesla K40c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro S7000Tesla K40c
DirectX
12 (11_1)+9%
11_0
Max Displays
6
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7000 draws 150W versus the Tesla K40c's 245W — a 48.1% difference. The FirePro S7000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7000) vs 350W (Tesla K40c). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 292mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro S7000Tesla K40c
TDP
150W-39%
245W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
292mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
30.2+65%
18.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S7000 came in at $1249, while the Tesla K40c launched at $7699. On MSRP, FirePro S7000 was 83.8% cheaper ($6450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (FirePro S7000) vs 0.6 (Tesla K40c) — the FirePro S7000 offers 500% better value. The newer card here is Tesla K40c (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro S7000Tesla K40c
MSRP
$1249-84%
$7699
Performance per Dollar
3.6+500%
0.6
Codename
Pitcairn
GK180
Release
August 27 2012
October 8 2013
Ranking
#462
#465

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.