
FirePro S9050 vs CMP 30HX

FirePro S9050
Popular choices:

CMP 30HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro S9050 is positioned at rank 271 and the CMP 30HX is on rank 190, so the CMP 30HX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9050
Performance Per Dollar CMP 30HX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The CMP 30HX is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The CMP 30HX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S9050 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro S9050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the CMP 30HX.
| Insight | FirePro S9050 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The CMP 30HX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $1,825 for the FirePro S9050, it costs 97% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 2936.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro S9050 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2936.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,825) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and CMP 30HX

FirePro S9050
The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the CMP 30HX reaches 4,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the CMP 30HX uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 1,408 (CMP 30HX). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,901 | 4,892 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+27% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS+56% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 112+27% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 0.44 MB | 1.4 MB+218% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.5 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the CMP 30HX has 2 GB. The FirePro S9050 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.5 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 (CMP 30HX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs No (CMP 30HX). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs No.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | No |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the CMP 30HX's 125W — a 57.1% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 350W (CMP 30HX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 254mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 125W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 254mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 75°C-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 21.8 | 39.1+79% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1825, while the CMP 30HX launched at $799 and now averages $60. The CMP 30HX costs 96.7% less ($1765 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (FirePro S9050) vs 81.5 (CMP 30HX) — the CMP 30HX offers 2918.5% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $799-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1825 | $60-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 81.5+2919% |
| Codename | Tahiti | TU116 |
| Release | August 7 2014 | February 25 2021 |
| Ranking | #446 | #447 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














