FirePro S9050
VS
CMP 30HX

FirePro S9050 vs CMP 30HX

FirePro S9050

2014Core: 900 MHz
VS

CMP 30HX

2021Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro S9050 is positioned at rank 271 and the CMP 30HX is on rank 190, so the CMP 30HX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9050

#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
96%
#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
95%
#110
Quadro GV100
MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999
86%
#256
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6030%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
100%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
98%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
97%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
96%
#278
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
95%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
92%
#280
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
90%
#281
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
90%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
87%
#286
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar CMP 30HX

#83
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200
99%
#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
98%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
96%
#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
91%
#87
A10G
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000
89%
#88
Tesla T4
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000
88%
#89
Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120
87%
#174
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2414%
#189
FirePro W2100
MSRP: $139|Avg: $30
100%
#190
CMP 30HX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $60
100%
#192
FirePro M6000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
99%
#195
FirePro M4170
MSRP: $200|Avg: $80
95%
#196
GRID K140Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $500
95%
#199
Radeon Pro Duo
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $799
91%
#200
P102-100
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
90%
#202
Quadro FX 2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The CMP 30HX is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The CMP 30HX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S9050 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro S9050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the CMP 30HX.

InsightFirePro S9050CMP 30HX
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (254mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The CMP 30HX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $1,825 for the FirePro S9050, it costs 97% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 2936.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro S9050CMP 30HX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+2936.1%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,825)
More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and CMP 30HX

AMD

FirePro S9050

The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

NVIDIA

CMP 30HX

The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the CMP 30HX reaches 4,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the CMP 30HX uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 1,408 (CMP 30HX). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX).

FeatureFirePro S9050CMP 30HX
G3D Mark Score
4,901
4,892
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1792+27%
1408
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS+56%
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
112+27%
88
L1 Cache
0.44 MB
1.4 MB+218%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1.5 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S9050CMP 30HX
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S9050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the CMP 30HX has 2 GB. The FirePro S9050 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S9050CMP 30HX
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1.5 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 (CMP 30HX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro S9050CMP 30HX
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
1
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs No (CMP 30HX). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs No.

FeatureFirePro S9050CMP 30HX
Encoder
VCE 1.0
No
Decoder
UVD 3.2
No
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the CMP 30HX's 125W — a 57.1% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 350W (CMP 30HX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 254mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro S9050CMP 30HX
TDP
225W
125W-44%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
254mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
75°C-17%
Perf/Watt
21.8
39.1+79%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1825, while the CMP 30HX launched at $799 and now averages $60. The CMP 30HX costs 96.7% less ($1765 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (FirePro S9050) vs 81.5 (CMP 30HX) — the CMP 30HX offers 2918.5% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro S9050CMP 30HX
MSRP
$1999
$799-60%
Avg Price (30d)
$1825
$60-97%
Performance per Dollar
2.7
81.5+2919%
Codename
Tahiti
TU116
Release
August 7 2014
February 25 2021
Ranking
#446
#447