
FirePro S9050
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro S9050
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,901 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌702.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+142.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1848% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
FirePro S9050
2014GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅+142.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1848% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,901 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌702.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than FirePro S9050?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is FirePro S9050 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

FirePro S9050
FirePro S9050
The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 142.6%. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,901 | 11,892+143% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2560+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+179% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+40% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.44 MB | 2.5 MB+468% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro S9050 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 53.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 254mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 130W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 254mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 75°C-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 21.8 | 91.5+320% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 87.5% less ($1750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1812% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $249-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 47.8+1812% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GA106 |
| Release | August 7 2014 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #446 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












