
FirePro V3800

Radeon R3
FirePro V3800 vs Radeon R3 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V3800 vs Radeon R3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V3800 vs Radeon R3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V3800
2010Why buy it
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌158% HIGHER MSRP$129 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌48% higher power demand at 74W vs 50W.
Radeon R3
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 152.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅FirePro V3800 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R3 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 74W, a 24W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V3800 vs Radeon R3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V3800
The FirePro V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 321 points. Launch price was $479.

Radeon R3
The Radeon R3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 314 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V3800 scores 321 and the Radeon R3 reaches 314 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V3800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R3 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V3800) vs 512 (Radeon R3). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V3800) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon R3).
| Feature | FirePro V3800 | Radeon R3 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 321+2% | 314 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+56% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+13% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 128 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V3800 | Radeon R3 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V3800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R3 carries 512 MB. FirePro V3800 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V3800 and 64-bit on the Radeon R3. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro V3800) vs 512 KB (Radeon R3) — the Radeon R3 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V3800 | Radeon R3 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V3800) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R3). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro V3800 | Radeon R3 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (12_0)+7% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V3800) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R3). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V3800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R3).
| Feature | FirePro V3800 | Radeon R3 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V3800 draws 74W versus the Radeon R3's 50W — a 38.7% difference. The Radeon R3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V3800) vs 350W (Radeon R3). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.
| Feature | FirePro V3800 | Radeon R3 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 50W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.3 | 6.3+47% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V3800 came in at $129, while the Radeon R3 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon R3 was 61.2% cheaper ($79 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro V3800) vs 6.3 (Radeon R3) — the Radeon R3 offers 152% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R3 (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro V3800 | Radeon R3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $50-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 6.3+152% |
| Codename | Juniper | Polaris 23 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #780 | #757 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














