
FirePro V5900

Quadro FX 5800
FirePro V5900 vs Quadro FX 5800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V5900 vs Quadro FX 5800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V5900 vs Quadro FX 5800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V5900
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 494.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 5800
2008Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌484.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V5900 vs Quadro FX 5800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V5900
The FirePro V5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points.

Quadro FX 5800
The Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,211 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5900 scores 1,232 and the Quadro FX 5800 reaches 1,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro FX 5800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro V5900) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5800). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (FirePro V5900) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5800).
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,232+2% | 1,211 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+113% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6144 TFLOPS | 0.6221 TFLOPS+1% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V5900 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 5800 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 5800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V5900 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5800. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V5900) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 5800) — the FirePro V5900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5900 draws 75W versus the Quadro FX 5800's 189W — a 86.4% difference. The FirePro V5900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5900) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-60% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.4+156% | 6.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V5900 came in at $599, while the Quadro FX 5800 launched at $3499. On MSRP, FirePro V5900 was 82.9% cheaper ($2900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (FirePro V5900) vs 0.3 (Quadro FX 5800) — the FirePro V5900 offers 600% better value. The newer card here is FirePro V5900 (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-83% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1+600% | 0.3 |
| Codename | Cayman | GT200B |
| Release | May 24 2011 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #812 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















