FirePro V7800
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

FirePro V7800 vs GeForce GTX 1650

FirePro V7800

2011Core: 725 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V7800 is positioned at rank #257 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7800

#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
100%
#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
97%
#240
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5533%
#256
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
100%
#257
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
100%
#258
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
100%
#259
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
99%
#260
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
99%
#262
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
96%
#263
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
94%
#264
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
94%
#265
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
94%
#266
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
93%
#267
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
93%
#268
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
92%
#269
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
92%
#270
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V7800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 288% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro V7800.

InsightFirePro V7800GeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-288%)
Leading raw performance (+288%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (254mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $96 for the FirePro V7800, it costs 22% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 396.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro V7800GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+396.7%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($96)
More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V7800 and GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

FirePro V7800

The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro V7800 scores 2,028 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 288%. The FirePro V7800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7800) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7800) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureFirePro V7800GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
2,028
7,869+288%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Turing
Process Node
40 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1280+43%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.856 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+61%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+43%
56
L1 Cache
320 KB
896 KB+180%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V7800GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V7800) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V7800GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V7800) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: None vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro V7800GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
11.2
12+7%
Vulkan
None
1.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6+5%
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V7800) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7800) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureFirePro V7800GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
None
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
UVD 2.3
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V7800 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7800) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 254mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

FeatureFirePro V7800GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
150W
75W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
254mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
70°C-18%
Perf/Watt
13.5
104.9+677%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro V7800 launched at $759 MSRP and currently averages $96, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 21.9% less ($21 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.1 (FirePro V7800) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 397.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro V7800GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$759
$149-80%
Avg Price (30d)
$96
$75-22%
Performance per Dollar
21.1
104.9+397%
Codename
Cayman
TU117
Release
May 24 2011
April 23 2019
Ranking
#656
#323