FirePro W7000 Adapter vs GeForce GTX 1060

FirePro W7000 Adapter

2012Core: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······

FirePro W7000 Adapter vs GeForce GTX 1060 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W7000 Adapter vs GeForce GTX 1060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W7000 Adapter

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,383 vs 10,064).
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 261% HIGHER MSRP
    $899 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • +129.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $650 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
  • Delivers 729% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
  • FirePro W7000 Adapter is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 129.6% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 4,383), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $650 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $899, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 729% (40.4 vs 4.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro W7000 Adapter vs GeForce GTX 1060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W7000 Adapter

The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro W7000 Adapter scores 4,383 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 129.6%. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterGeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
4,383
10,064+130%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
1280
2560+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.432 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+265%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
80
160+100%
L1 Cache
320 KB
960 KB+200%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W7000 Adapter leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterGeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7000 Adapter has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W7000 Adapter and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterGeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterGeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: UVD vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterGeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
UVD
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7000 Adapter draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 18.2% difference. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterGeForce GTX 1060
TDP
150W-17%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin
Length
242mm
173mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
29.2
55.9+91%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W7000 Adapter came in at $899, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 72.3% cheaper ($650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 724.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterGeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$899
$249-72%
Performance per Dollar
4.9
40.4+724%
Codename
Pitcairn
GP104
Release
June 13 2012
May 27 2016
Ranking
#477
#137

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.