
FirePro W7000 Adapter vs GeForce GTX 1060

FirePro W7000 Adapter
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is positioned at rank #219 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7000 Adapter
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 129.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W7000 Adapter.
| Insight | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-129.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+129.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W7000 Adapter holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $60), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 74.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+74.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7000 Adapter and GeForce GTX 1060

FirePro W7000 Adapter
The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro W7000 Adapter scores 4,383 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 129.6%. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,383 | 10,064+130% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2560+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+265% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 960 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7000 Adapter comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: UVD vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | UVD | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7000 Adapter draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 18.2% difference. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-17% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 29.2 | 55.9+91% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W7000 Adapter launched at $899 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The FirePro W7000 Adapter costs 75% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 292.2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 74.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $249-72% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-75% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 292.2+74% | 167.7 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GP104 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #477 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















