
FirePro W7000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro W7000
2012Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌80.2% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 480
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
FirePro W7000
2012GeForce GTX 480
2010Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌80.2% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro W7000 better than GeForce GTX 480?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 480 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7000 and GeForce GTX 480

FirePro W7000
FirePro W7000
The FirePro W7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,304 points. Launch price was $899.

GeForce GTX 480
GeForce GTX 480
The GeForce GTX 480 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,075 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro W7000 scores 4,304 versus the GeForce GTX 480's 4,075 — the FirePro W7000 leads by 5.6%. The FirePro W7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 480 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000) vs 480 (GeForce GTX 480). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,304+6% | 4,075 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+167% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS+81% | 1.345 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80+33% | 60 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 960 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 480 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro W7000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 480 has 2 GB. The FirePro W7000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro W7000) vs 768 KB (GeForce GTX 480) — the GeForce GTX 480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+167% | 1.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 384-bit+500% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+200% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 480).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | UVD | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7000 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 480's 250W — a 50% difference. The FirePro W7000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 480). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 28.7+76% | 16.3 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W7000 launched at $899 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 480 launched at $499. The GeForce GTX 480 costs 44.5% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (FirePro W7000) vs 8.2 (GeForce GTX 480) — the GeForce GTX 480 offers 70.8% better value. The FirePro W7000 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $499-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8 | 8.2+71% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GF100 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | March 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #477 | #488 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












