FirePro W8000
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

FirePro W8000 vs GeForce GTX 1650

FirePro W8000

2012Core: 900 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W8000 is positioned at rank #260 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8000

#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
97%
#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
88%
#245
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5554%
#260
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
100%
#261
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
99%
#262
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
99%
#264
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
97%
#265
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
94%
#266
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
94%
#267
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
94%
#268
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
94%
#269
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
93%
#270
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
92%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
92%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
91%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W8000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 84.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W8000.

InsightFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-84.8%)
Leading raw performance (+84.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (279mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $1,599 for the FirePro W8000, it costs 95% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 3839.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+3839.1%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599)
More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W8000 and GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

FirePro W8000

The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro W8000 scores 4,259 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 84.8%. The FirePro W8000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W8000) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
4,259
7,869+85%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1792+100%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+8%
2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112+100%
56
L1 Cache
448 KB
896 KB+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W8000) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W8000) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W8000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
UVD 3.2
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W8000 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 279mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 58°C vs 70°C.

FeatureFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
225W
75W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
279mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
58°C-17%
70°C
Perf/Watt
18.9
104.9+455%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W8000 launched at $1599 MSRP and currently averages $1599, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 95.3% less ($1524 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (FirePro W8000) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 3785.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$1599
$149-91%
Avg Price (30d)
$1599
$75-95%
Performance per Dollar
2.7
104.9+3785%
Codename
Tahiti
TU117
Release
June 14 2012
April 23 2019
Ranking
#481
#323