
FirePro W8000 vs GeForce GTX 480

FirePro W8000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W8000 is positioned at rank #260 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W8000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 480.
| Insight | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (279mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 480 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 480 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $1,599), it costs 94% less, resulting in a 1429.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1429.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W8000 and GeForce GTX 480

FirePro W8000
The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.

GeForce GTX 480
The GeForce GTX 480 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,075 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W8000 scores 4,259 and the GeForce GTX 480 reaches 4,075 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 480 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W8000) vs 480 (GeForce GTX 480). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480).
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,259+5% | 4,075 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+273% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+140% | 1.345 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 112+87% | 60 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 960 KB+114% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W8000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 480 has 2 GB. The FirePro W8000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro W8000) vs 768 KB (GeForce GTX 480) — the GeForce GTX 480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+167% | 1.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 384-bit+500% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8000) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+200% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W8000) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W8000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 480).
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W8000 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 480's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The FirePro W8000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8000) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 480). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 279mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 58°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 279mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 58°C-36% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 18.9+16% | 16.3 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W8000 launched at $1599 MSRP and currently averages $1599, while the GeForce GTX 480 launched at $499 and now averages $100. The GeForce GTX 480 costs 93.7% less ($1499 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (FirePro W8000) vs 40.8 (GeForce GTX 480) — the GeForce GTX 480 offers 1411.1% better value. The FirePro W8000 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599 | $499-69% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1599 | $100-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 40.8+1411% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GF100 |
| Release | June 14 2012 | March 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #481 | #488 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











