FireStream 9250
GeForce RTX 2060
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 2060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 2060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9250
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,165 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌186.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1111.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3367.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FireStream 9250
The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FireStream 9250 scores 1,165 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 1111.5%. The FireStream 9250 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 55 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9250) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,165 | 14,114+1112% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Turing |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1920+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+545% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 120+200% |
| L1 Cache | 0.16 MB | 1.9 MB+1088% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FireStream 9250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9250 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FireStream 9250) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 6 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9250) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+19% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9250) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: UVD 2.0 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FireStream 9250) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | UVD 2.0 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9250 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 6.5% difference. The FireStream 9250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9250) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 234mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 72.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-6% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 234mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 88.2+1031% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FireStream 9250 came in at $999, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2060 was 65.1% cheaper ($650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (FireStream 9250) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 3266.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $349-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 40.4+3267% |
| Codename | RV770 | TU106 |
| Release | June 16 2008 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #840 | #168 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9250 and GeForce RTX 2060
