FireStream 9250
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9250
2008Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,165 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1393.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FireStream 9250
The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FireStream 9250 scores 1,165 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU's 17,400 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 1393.6%. The FireStream 9250 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9250) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,165 | 17,400+1394% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 4352+444% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+2106% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 136+240% |
| L1 Cache | 0.16 MB | 4.3 MB+2587% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 32 MB+12700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FireStream 9250 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FireStream 9250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9250 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FireStream 9250) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 8 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 32 MB+12700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9250) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 Ultimate+19% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9250) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Decoder: UVD 2.0 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FireStream 9250) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD 2.0 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9250 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU's 160W — a 6.5% difference. The FireStream 9250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9250) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 80°C.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-6% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 234mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 108.8+1295% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Codename | RV770 | AD106 |
| Release | June 16 2008 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #840 | #59 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9250 and GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
