FireStream 9250
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9250
2008Why buy it
- ✅Measures 234mm instead of 240mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,165 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150.4% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1844.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4768% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FireStream 9250
The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FireStream 9250 scores 1,165 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1844.3%. The FireStream 9250 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9250) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,165 | 22,651+1844% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 4352+444% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+2106% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 136+240% |
| L1 Cache | 0.16 MB | 4.3 MB+2587% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 32 MB+12700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FireStream 9250 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FireStream 9250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9250 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FireStream 9250) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 8 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 32 MB+12700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9250) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12.2+21% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9250) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: UVD 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FireStream 9250) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 2.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9250 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 6.5% difference. The FireStream 9250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9250) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 234mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 70°C.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-6% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 234mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 141.6+1715% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FireStream 9250 came in at $999, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 60.1% cheaper ($600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (FireStream 9250) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 4633.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $399-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 56.8+4633% |
| Codename | RV770 | AD106 |
| Release | June 16 2008 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #840 | #59 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9250 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
