FireStream 9250
GeForce RTX 4070
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9250
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 234mm instead of 304mm, a 70mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,165 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2210.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3753.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
- ❌29.9% longer card at 304mm vs 234mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FireStream 9250
The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FireStream 9250 scores 1,165 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 2210.6%. The FireStream 9250 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9250) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,165 | 26,919+2211% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 5888+636% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+2815% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 184+360% |
| L1 Cache | 0.16 MB | 5.8 MB+3525% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 36 MB+14300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FireStream 9250 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FireStream 9250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9250 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FireStream 9250) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 12 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 36 MB+14300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9250) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12.2+21% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9250) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: UVD 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FireStream 9250) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 2.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9250 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The FireStream 9250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9250) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 234mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 80°C.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 234mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 1-67% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 134.6+1626% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FireStream 9250 came in at $999, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 40% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (FireStream 9250) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 3641.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $599-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 44.9+3642% |
| Codename | RV770 | AD104 |
| Release | June 16 2008 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #840 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9250 and GeForce RTX 4070
