FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2

FireStream 9250

2008Core: 625 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4850 X2

2008Core: 625 MHz

FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9250

2008

Why buy it

  • Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
  • Measures 234mm instead of 267mm, a 33mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 150.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4850 X2

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 143.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
  • 14.1% longer card at 267mm vs 234mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FireStream 9250 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (1,165 vs 1,132), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FireStream 9250 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4850 X2 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $600 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 143.3% (2.8 vs 1.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4850 X2 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FireStream 9250 has the stronger long-term case.

FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FireStream 9250

The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 4850 X2

The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 7 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,132 points. Launch price was $420.

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9250 scores 1,165 and the Radeon HD 4850 X2 reaches 1,132 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9250 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9250) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250) vs 1 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 4850 X2).

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon HD 4850 X2
G3D Mark Score
1,165+3%
1,132
Architecture
TeraScale
TeraScale
Process Node
55 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
800
800 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
1 TFLOPS
1 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs
16
16 ×2
TMUs
40
40 ×2
L1 Cache
160 KB
160 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon HD 4850 X2
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9250 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4850 X2.

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon HD 4850 X2
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9250) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon HD 4850 X2
DirectX
10.1
10.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9250) vs None (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Decoder: UVD 2.0 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FireStream 9250) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4850 X2).

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon HD 4850 X2
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
UVD 2.0
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9250 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 4850 X2's 250W — a 50% difference. The FireStream 9250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9250) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin. Card length: 234mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 95.

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon HD 4850 X2
TDP
150W-40%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length
234mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
Unknown-100%
95
Perf/Watt
7.8+73%
4.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FireStream 9250 came in at $999, while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 launched at $399. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4850 X2 was 60.1% cheaper ($600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (FireStream 9250) vs 2.8 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) — the Radeon HD 4850 X2 offers 133.3% better value.

FeatureFireStream 9250Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP
$999
$399-60%
Performance per Dollar
1.2
2.8+133%
Codename
RV770
R700
Release
June 16 2008
November 7 2008
Ranking
#840
#848

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.