FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9250
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 234mm instead of 267mm, a 33mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150.4% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon HD 4850 X2
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 143.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
- ❌14.1% longer card at 267mm vs 234mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FireStream 9250
The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.

Radeon HD 4850 X2
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 7 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,132 points. Launch price was $420.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9250 scores 1,165 and the Radeon HD 4850 X2 reaches 1,132 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9250 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9250) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250) vs 1 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 4850 X2).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,165+3% | 1,132 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 800 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 1 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9250 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4850 X2.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9250) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9250) vs None (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Decoder: UVD 2.0 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FireStream 9250) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4850 X2).
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2.0 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9250 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 4850 X2's 250W — a 50% difference. The FireStream 9250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9250) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin. Card length: 234mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 95.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 234mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8+73% | 4.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FireStream 9250 came in at $999, while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 launched at $399. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4850 X2 was 60.1% cheaper ($600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (FireStream 9250) vs 2.8 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) — the Radeon HD 4850 X2 offers 133.3% better value.
| Feature | FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $399-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 2.8+133% |
| Codename | RV770 | R700 |
| Release | June 16 2008 | November 7 2008 |
| Ranking | #840 | #848 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















