FX-4150
VS
Core i7-6560U

FX-4150 vs Core i7-6560U

AMD

FX-4150

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-6560U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-4150 is positioned at rank 702 and the Core i7-6560U is on rank 378, so the Core i7-6560U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-4150

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12838%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12131%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8808%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2654%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2102%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1839%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1053%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1039%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
946%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
946%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
936%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
910%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
898%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
894%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
886%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
98%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
100%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
99%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
99%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
99%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
99%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
98%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
98%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
97%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
97%
#715
Core i5-6500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $123
96%
#716
Core i7-4770T
MSRP: $250|Avg: $39
96%
#717
Core i3-4340
MSRP: $149|Avg: $50
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-6560U

#366
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
526%
#367
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
518%
#368
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
476%
#369
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
474%
#370
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
469%
#372
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
453%
#373
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
435%
#374
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
434%
#375
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
422%
#378
Core i7-6560U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#391
Core i5-1145GRE
MSRP: $362|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The FX-4150 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-6560U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightFX-4150Core i7-6560U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightFX-4150Core i7-6560U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-4150 and Core i7-6560U

AMD

FX-4150

The FX-4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-6560U

The Core i7-6560U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,347 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The FX-4150 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-6560U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4150 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-4150 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-6560U — a 22.2% clock advantage for the FX-4150 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The FX-4150 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-6560U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4150 scores 3,327 against the Core i7-6560U's 3,347 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-6560U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-4150 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-6560U.

FeatureFX-4150Core i7-6560U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+25%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+73%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
512 kB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Zambezi (2011−2012)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
3,327
3,347
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-4150 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-6560U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-4150Core i7-6560U
Socket
AM3+
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%