FX-4150 vs Xeon X5570

FX-4150 vs Xeon X5570 Performance Spectrum

FX-4150

4 / 4

3,327

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X5570

4 / 8

3,306

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-4150 vs Xeon X5570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-4150 vs Xeon X5570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-4150

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5570 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5570, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $137 MSRP, while Xeon X5570 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X5570

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,306 vs 3,327).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-4150 better than Xeon X5570?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5570 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-4150 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-4150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-4150 is the better buy right now. FX-4150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $137 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X5570 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-4150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-4150 vs Xeon X5570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-4150

The FX-4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X5570

The Xeon X5570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,306 points. Launch price was $49.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-4150 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5570's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-4150 versus 3.33 GHz on the Xeon X5570 — a 18.3% clock advantage for the FX-4150 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The FX-4150 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X5570 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4150 scores 3,327 against the Xeon X5570's 3,306 — a 0.6% lead for the FX-4150. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	FX-4150	Xeon X5570
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4 GHz+20%	3.33 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+30%	2.93 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Zambezi (2011−2012)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	3,327	3,306

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-4150 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5570 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-4150	Xeon X5570
Socket	AM3+	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-4150) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5570). Primary use case: Xeon X5570 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5570 rivals Core i3-2100.