Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017Core: 1002 MHzBoost: 1053 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023Core: 1855 MHzBoost: 2495 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017

Why buy it

  • 85.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 25.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.8 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 295W, a 245W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $181 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4150 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 490% higher power demand at 295W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 85.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 215.7% in PassMark G3D (2,642 vs 837), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 14nm, 96 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 4150 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $181 more expensive on MSRP at $300 vs $119, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 25.2% (8.8 vs 7.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4150

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 scores 2,642 versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 837 — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 leads by 215.7%. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Raw compute: 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Boost clocks: 1053 MHz vs 2495 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
G3D Mark Score
2,642+216%
837
Architecture
GCN 4.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
896
6144+586%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.887 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS+3150%
Boost Clock
1053 MHz
2495 MHz+137%
ROPs
16
192+1100%
TMUs
56
384+586%
L1 Cache
0.22 MB
3 MB+1264%
L2 Cache
1 MB
6 MB+500%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 carries 512 MB. Radeon Pro WX 4150 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4150 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB
6 MB+500%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 295W — a 142% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
TDP
50W-83%
295W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
52.8+1786%
2.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 came in at $300, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 was 60.3% cheaper ($181 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 7.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 25.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 (2023 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP
$300
$119-60%
Performance per Dollar
8.8+26%
7.0
Codename
Baffin
Navi 31
Release
March 1 2017
April 13 2023
Ranking
#620
#26

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.