FX-4150
VS
Xeon E5-2609 v2

FX-4150 vs Xeon E5-2609 v2

AMD

FX-4150

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v2

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-4150 is positioned at rank 702 and the Xeon E5-2609 v2 is on rank 667, so the Xeon E5-2609 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-4150

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12838%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12131%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8808%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2654%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2102%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1839%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1053%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1039%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
946%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
946%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
936%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
910%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
898%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
894%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
886%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
98%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
100%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
99%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
99%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
99%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
99%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
98%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
98%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
97%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
97%
#715
Core i5-6500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $123
96%
#716
Core i7-4770T
MSRP: $250|Avg: $39
96%
#717
Core i3-4340
MSRP: $149|Avg: $50
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2609 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12334%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2329%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2069%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1598%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
100%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
99%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#397
Xeon W-3235
MSRP: $1538|Avg: $1538
99%
#398
Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6000
98%
#399
Xeon W-3365
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
97%
#667
Xeon E5-2609 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
100%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
100%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
100%
#674
Xeon E3-1265L v4
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
99%
#676
Xeon E5-1607 v2
MSRP: $250|Avg: $68
98%
#678
Xeon W5590
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2609 v2 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightFX-4150Xeon E5-2609 v2
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-4150 ($20), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($20 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightFX-4150Xeon E5-2609 v2
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-4150 and Xeon E5-2609 v2

AMD

FX-4150

The FX-4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v2

The Xeon E5-2609 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,369 points. Launch price was $396.

Processing Power

Both the FX-4150 and Xeon E5-2609 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-4150 versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v2 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the FX-4150 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The FX-4150 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2609 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4150 scores 3,327 against the Xeon E5-2609 v2's 3,369 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2609 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-4150 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2609 v2.

FeatureFX-4150Xeon E5-2609 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+60%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+52%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
4 MB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Zambezi (2011−2012)
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
3,327
3,369+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-4150 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2609 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-4150Xeon E5-2609 v2
Socket
AM3+
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%