FX-4150 vs Core i7-13700K
FX-4150
Core i7-13700K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The FX-4150 is positioned at rank #702 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-4150
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13700K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-4150 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($400) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-4150 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+45%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($400) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-4150 and Core i7-13700K
FX-4150
The FX-4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The FX-4150 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-4150 versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The FX-4150 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4150 scores 3,327 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 172.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-4150 vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.
| Feature | FX-4150 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 16 / 24+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+12% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+275% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | Intel 7 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 3,327 | 45,784+1276% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 31,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,846 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,980 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-4150 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-13700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-4150 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-4150) / true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the FX-4150 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | FX-4150 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The FX-4150 launched at $137 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700K debuted at $409. At current prices ($20 vs $400), the FX-4150 is $380 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-4150 delivers 166.3 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700K — making the FX-4150 the 37% better value option.
| Feature | FX-4150 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $137-67% | $409 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-95% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 166.3+45% | 114.5 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on FX-4150 and Core i7-13700K
