FX-6350
VS
Xeon X5667

FX-6350 vs Xeon X5667

AMD

FX-6350

6 Cores6 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Xeon X5667

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-6350 is positioned at rank 541 and the Xeon X5667 is on rank 579, so the FX-6350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6350

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8868%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8380%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6084%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1833%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1452%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1270%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
727%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
718%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
654%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
654%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
646%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
629%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
620%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
618%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
612%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
98%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
98%
#541
FX-6350
MSRP: $132|Avg: $55
100%
#542
Celeron G470
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
100%
#543
Pentium G3220
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
99%
#545
Athlon 5370
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
99%
#548
Core i3-6100
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
97%
#549
Core i3-6300T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
97%
#550
Core i3-6098P
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
97%
#551
Core i7-7800X
MSRP: $383|Avg: $254
96%
#552
Core i3-7101TE
MSRP: $117|Avg: $60
96%
#555
FX-8320E
MSRP: $147|Avg: $60
96%
#556
Pentium G3260
MSRP: $64|Avg: $21
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5667

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
8847%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1670%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1484%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1147%
#349
EPYC 4565P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $1980
100%
#351
Xeon W-2295
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $1400
99%
#352
Xeon 6741P
MSRP: $4421|Avg: $3780
97%
#353
EPYC 7452
MSRP: $2025|Avg: $2025
96%
#354
EPYC 7502P
MSRP: $2300|Avg: $1299
95%
#579
Xeon X5667
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#583
Xeon E3-1245 v2
MSRP: $273|Avg: $204
99%
#590
Xeon W-2125
MSRP: $444|Avg: $42
96%
#592
EPYC 7261
MSRP: $501|Avg: $8
95%
#594
Xeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X5667 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightFX-6350Xeon X5667
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($55)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6350 ($55), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($55 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightFX-6350Xeon X5667
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($55)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-6350 and Xeon X5667

AMD

FX-6350

The FX-6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,640 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon X5667

The Xeon X5667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,697 points. Launch price was $80.

Processing Power

The FX-6350 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon X5667 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-6350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-6350 versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5667 — a 19.3% clock advantage for the FX-6350 (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The FX-6350 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X5667 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6350 scores 4,640 against the Xeon X5667's 4,697 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon X5667.

FeatureFX-6350Xeon X5667
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+21%
3.46 GHz
Base Clock
3.9 GHz+27%
3.06 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6144 kB+2300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
4,640
4,697+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6350 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5667 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-6350Xeon X5667
Socket
AM3+
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
RAM Channels
3
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-6350) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5667). Primary use case: Xeon X5667 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5667 rivals Core i7-980X.

FeatureFX-6350Xeon X5667
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Workstation