FX-770K vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-770K vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-770K vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-770K

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-770K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,142 vs 3,172).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while FX-770K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-770K better than Ryzen Embedded R1305G?

Yes. FX-770K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-770K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-770K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-770K is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. FX-770K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded R1305G only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 9.6% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R1305G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-770K vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-770K

The FX-770K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,172 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-770K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-770K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the FX-770K versus 2.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G — a 32.8% clock advantage for the FX-770K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The FX-770K uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-770K scores 3,172 against the Ryzen Embedded R1305G's 3,142 — a 1% lead for the FX-770K.

Feature	FX-770K	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+39%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+133%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	512 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	3,172	3,142

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-770K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-770K	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Socket	FM2+	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-770K was priced at $0, while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G came in at $150. On launch pricing ($0 vs $150), FX-770K was $150 cheaper.

Feature	FX-770K	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP	$0-100%	$150
Performance per Dollar	—	20.9
Release Date	2014	2020

Search FX-770K on Amazon

Search Ryzen Embedded R1305G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.