Core i7-4600M
VS
FX-770K

Core i7-4600M vs FX-770K

Intel

Core i7-4600M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013
VS
AMD

FX-770K

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i7-4600M is positioned at rank #71 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4600M

#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
94%
#59
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
229%
#60
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
226%
#61
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
207%
#62
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
206%
#63
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
204%
#65
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
197%
#66
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
189%
#67
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
189%
#68
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
184%
#71
Core i7-4600M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
98%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The FX-770K leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-4600M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-4600MFX-770K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($59)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-4600MFX-770K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($59)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4600M and FX-770K

Intel

Core i7-4600M

The Core i7-4600M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,204 points. Launch price was $346.

AMD

FX-770K

The FX-770K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,172 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4600M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-770K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-770K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4600M versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-770K — a 8% clock advantage for the FX-770K (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-4600M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-770K uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4600M scores 3,204 against the FX-770K's 3,172 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-4600M.

FeatureCore i7-4600MFX-770K
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
3.5 GHz+21%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
4 MB+1500%
Process
22 nm-21%
28 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark
3,204+1%
3,172
Cinebench R23 Multi
656
Geekbench 6 Single
1,025
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,132
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4600M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-770K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4600MFX-770K
Socket
PGA946
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L 1600 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-4600M) / not specified (FX-770K). The Core i7-4600M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-770K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4600M targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-4600MFX-770K
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Mobile