Core i7-4600M vs FX-770K

Core i7-4600M vs FX-770K Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4600M

2 / 4

3,204

+1.0%

3,172

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4600M vs FX-770K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4600M vs FX-770K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4600M

2013

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while FX-770K needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-770K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

FX-770K

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,172 vs 3,204).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4600M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-770K better than Core i7-4600M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-770K is ahead with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4600M pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4600M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-770K still makes the most sense overall. FX-770K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-770K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4600M vs FX-770K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4600M

The Core i7-4600M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,204 points. Launch price was $346.

FX-770K

The FX-770K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,172 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4600M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-770K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-770K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4600M versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-770K — a 8% clock advantage for the FX-770K (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-4600M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-770K uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4600M scores 3,204 against the FX-770K's 3,172 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-4600M.

Feature	Core i7-4600M	FX-770K
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.5 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+6300%	4 MB
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark	3,204+1%	3,172
Cinebench R23 Multi	656	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,025	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,132	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4600M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-770K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4600M	FX-770K
Socket	PGA946	FM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L 1600 MHz	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-4600M) / not specified (FX-770K). The Core i7-4600M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-770K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4600M targets Mobile.