
GeForce 205

Quadro FX 380M
GeForce 205 vs Quadro FX 380M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 205 vs Quadro FX 380M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 205 vs Quadro FX 380M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 205
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Quadro FX 380M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 205 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 189W, a 179W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 380M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quadro FX 380M
2008Why buy it
- ✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌1790% higher power demand at 189W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 205 vs Quadro FX 380M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 205
The GeForce 205 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 126 points.

Quadro FX 380M
The Quadro FX 380M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 205 scores 126 and the Quadro FX 380M reaches 121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 205 is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 380M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 205) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380M). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 205) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380M).
| Feature | GeForce 205 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 126+4% | 121 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+60% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS+28% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 205 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 380M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 205 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 205 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 380M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 205) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 380M) — the GeForce 205 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 205 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 205) vs 11.1 (FL10_1) (Quadro FX 380M). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 205 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.1 (FL10_1)+10% |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 205) vs VP4 (Quadro FX 380M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 205) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro FX 380M).
| Feature | GeForce 205 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VP4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 205 draws 10W versus the Quadro FX 380M's 189W — a 179.9% difference. The GeForce 205 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 205) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 205 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-95% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.6+2000% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 205 (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 205 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | — |
| Codename | GP108B | GT200B |
| Release | February 20 2019 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #643 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














