GeForce 205 vs Radeon HD 4250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 205 vs Radeon HD 4250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 205 vs Radeon HD 4250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 205

2019

Why buy it

✅0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Radeon HD 4250 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 205 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 10W instead of 110W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.

Radeon HD 4250

2008

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 205 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1000% higher power demand at 110W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 205 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (126 vs 123), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 205 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 205 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $50 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2.4% (2.5 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 205 vs Radeon HD 4250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 205

The GeForce 205 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 126 points.

Radeon HD 4250

The Radeon HD 4250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 123 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 205 scores 126 and the Radeon HD 4250 reaches 123 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 205 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 4250 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 205) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4250). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 205) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4250).

Feature	GeForce 205	Radeon HD 4250
G3D Mark Score	126+2%	123
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale
Process Node	14 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	1 TFLOPS+25%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	144 KB	160 KB+11%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 205 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 205	Radeon HD 4250
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 205 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4250. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 205) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 4250) — the GeForce 205 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 205	Radeon HD 4250
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 205) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4250). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 205	Radeon HD 4250
DirectX	10.1	10.1
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 205) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4250). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 2.

Feature	GeForce 205	Radeon HD 4250
Encoder	None	UVD 2
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP4)	UVD 2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 205 draws 10W versus the Radeon HD 4250's 110W — a 166.7% difference. The GeForce 205 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 205) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4250). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce 205	Radeon HD 4250
TDP	10W-91%	110W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	1mm
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	12.6+1045%	1.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 205 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 4250 launched at $50. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GeForce 205) vs 2.5 (Radeon HD 4250) — the Radeon HD 4250 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 205 (2019 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 205	Radeon HD 4250
MSRP	$50	$50
Performance per Dollar	2.5	2.5
Codename	GP108B	RV770
Release	February 20 2019	June 25 2008
Ranking	#643	#876

Search GeForce 205 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.