GeForce 210 vs GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce 210

2019Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce 210

138

0.0%

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

7,869

+5602.2%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 210 is positioned at rank #599 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 210

#589

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

3934%

#591

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

3566%

#592

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

3557%

#596

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

3234%

#597

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

3212%

#599

GeForce 210

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

100%

#600

Mobility Radeon X1900

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#601

Mobility Radeon HD 4330

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

100%

#602

Radeon R7 M365X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#603

Mobility Radeon HD 5870

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

99%

#604

Radeon R7 M260DX

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

99%

#605

Radeon HD 8610G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

97%

#606

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8750M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $60

95%

#607

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

94%

#608

GeForce 9800M GS

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

94%

#609

Radeon R7 M270

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

93%

#610

GeForce 9800 GTX

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

93%

#611

Mobility Radeon HD 5850

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

92%

#612

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

92%

#614

GeForce 205

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5602.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 210.

Insight	GeForce 210	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5602.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+5602.2%)
Longevity	Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $5), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 280.1% better value per dollar than the GeForce 210.

Insight	GeForce 210	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+280.1%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($5)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 210 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 210 and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce 210

The GeForce 210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 138 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 210 scores 138 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 5602.2%. The GeForce 210 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 210) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 210) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 210	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	138	7,869+5602%
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	384	896+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+274%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1665 MHz+60%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	56+133%
L1 Cache	144 KB	896 KB+522%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 210	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 210 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 210) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 210	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 210) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce 210	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	10.1	12+19%
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 210) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 210) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce 210	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	None	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 210 draws 10W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 152.9% difference. The GeForce 210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 210) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce 210	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	10W-87%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	168mm	229mm
Height	69mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	13.8	104.9+660%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 210 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce 210 costs 93.3% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.6 (GeForce 210) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 280.1% better value.