
GeForce 210

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 210
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 160W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2019 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅6396.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 1956.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1500% higher power demand at 160W vs 10W.
- ❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 210
The GeForce 210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 138 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 210 scores 138 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 16313.8%. The GeForce 210 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 210) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 210) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 138 | 22,651+16314% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4352+1033% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+2667% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 2535 MHz+144% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 136+467% |
| L1 Cache | 0.14 MB | 4.3 MB+2971% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 32 MB+6300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce 210 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce 210 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 210 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 210 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 210) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 8 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 32 MB+6300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 210) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12.2+21% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 210) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 210) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 210 draws 10W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 176.5% difference. The GeForce 210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 210) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-94% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 240mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 13.8 | 141.6+926% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 210 came in at $50, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce 210 was 87.5% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (GeForce 210) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1928.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-87% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | 56.8+1929% |
| Codename | GP108B | AD106 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #643 | #59 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














