GeForce 310M vs Radeon HD 4250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 310M vs Radeon HD 4250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 310M vs Radeon HD 4250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 310M

2015

Why buy it

✅2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 33W instead of 110W, a 77W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4250

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 310M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 110W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 310M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (127 vs 123), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 310M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4250 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 310M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 310M vs Radeon HD 4250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 310M

The GeForce 310M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points.

Radeon HD 4250

The Radeon HD 4250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 123 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 310M scores 127 and the Radeon HD 4250 reaches 123 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 310M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 4250 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 310M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4250). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 310M) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4250).

Feature	GeForce 310M	Radeon HD 4250
G3D Mark Score	127+3%	123
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	1 TFLOPS+137%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	192 KB+20%	160 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 310M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 310M	Radeon HD 4250
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 310M and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4250. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 310M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4250) — the GeForce 310M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 310M	Radeon HD 4250
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 310M) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4250). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 310M	Radeon HD 4250
DirectX	10.1	10.1
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 310M) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4250). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 2.

Feature	GeForce 310M	Radeon HD 4250
Encoder	None	UVD 2
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	UVD 2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 310M draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 4250's 110W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce 310M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 310M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4250). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 310M	Radeon HD 4250
TDP	33W-70%	110W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	—	1mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.8+245%	1.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 310M (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 310M	Radeon HD 4250
MSRP	—	$50
Codename	GM108	RV770
Release	March 13 2015	June 25 2008
Ranking	#880	#876

Search GeForce 310M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.