GeForce 320M
VS
GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce 320M vs GeForce GTX 1060

NVIDIA

GeForce 320M

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 320M is positioned at rank #101 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 320M

#30
Radeon 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#31
Radeon RX 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
#91
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
259%
#93
234%
#94
234%
#98
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
213%
#99
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
211%
#101
GeForce 320M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#103
Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
MSRP: $99|Avg: $45
99%
#105
GeForce GTX 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
98%
#106
Radeon HD 7470M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12
97%
#110
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
96%
#114
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
MSRP: $179|Avg: $40
93%
#116
GeForce GTX 880M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4692.4% higher G3D Mark score and 2300% more VRAM (6 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 320M.

InsightGeForce 320MGeForce GTX 1060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4692.4%)
Leading raw performance (+4692.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+2300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 320M and GeForce GTX 1060

NVIDIA

GeForce 320M

The GeForce 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 320M scores 210 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 4692.4%. The GeForce 320M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 320M) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 320M) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 320MGeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
210
10,064+4692%
Architecture
Maxwell
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
384
2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4216 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+2005%
Boost Clock
549 MHz
1733 MHz+216%
ROPs
8
64+700%
TMUs
24
160+567%
L1 Cache
192 KB
960 KB+400%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 320MGeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 320M comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 320M) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 320MGeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
6 GB+2300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
192 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 320M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce 320MGeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
10.1
12+19%
OpenGL
3.3
4.5+36%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 320M) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 320M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureGeForce 320MGeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
None
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 320M draws 33W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 138% difference. The GeForce 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 320M) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: Legacy vs 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 320MGeForce GTX 1060
TDP
33W-82%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
Legacy
6-pin
Length
173mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
6.4
55.9+773%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 320MGeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$249
Avg Price (30d)
$60
Codename
GM108
GP104
Release
March 13 2015
May 27 2016
Ranking
#880
#137