GeForce 605 vs FirePro V3800
GeForce 605
Popular choices:
FirePro V3800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 605 is positioned at rank 115 and the FirePro V3800 is on rank 268, so the GeForce 605 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 605
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V3800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 605 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V3800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 605 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro V3800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V3800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $12 (vs $30), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 143.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 605 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+143.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($12) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 605 and FirePro V3800
GeForce 605
The GeForce 605 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points. Launch price was $99.
FirePro V3800
The FirePro V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 321 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 605 scores 330 and the FirePro V3800 reaches 321 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 605 is built on Kepler while the FirePro V3800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 605) vs 800 (FirePro V3800). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce 605) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V3800).
| Feature | GeForce 605 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 330+3% | 321 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS | 1.104 TFLOPS+59% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 80 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 605 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 605 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V3800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V3800 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 605 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 605) vs 11.2 (FirePro V3800). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 605 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 605) vs None (FirePro V3800). Decoder: VP5 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 605) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V3800).
| Feature | GeForce 605 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | VP5 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 605 draws 65W versus the FirePro V3800's 74W — a 12.9% difference. The GeForce 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce 605) vs 350W (FirePro V3800). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce 605 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-12% | 74W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 168mm |
| Height | 69mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 5.1+19% | 4.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 605 launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FirePro V3800 launched at $129 and now averages $12. The FirePro V3800 costs 60% less ($18 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.0 (GeForce 605) vs 26.8 (FirePro V3800) — the FirePro V3800 offers 143.6% better value. The GeForce 605 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 605 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-77% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $12-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.0 | 26.8+144% |
| Codename | GK107 | Juniper |
| Release | June 5 2012 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #837 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 605 and FirePro V3800
