GeForce 6600 LE
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce 6600 LE vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce 6600 LE

2012Core: 823 MHzBoost: 888 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 6600 LE is positioned at rank #319 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6600 LE

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
4267%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4099%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
4052%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4045%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4036%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
4014%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
3963%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3948%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3912%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
3901%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
3854%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3846%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
3776%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3774%
#304
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
4706%
#319
GeForce 6600 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
100%
#320
Radeon HD 3670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
99%
#321
Radeon HD 3200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
96%
#322
Radeon HD 2350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $48
91%
#323
Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
90%
#324
Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
89%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
82%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
77%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
68%
#330
RADEON X550XT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $40
66%
#334
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
50%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6600 LE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15329.4% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6600 LE.

InsightGeForce 6600 LEGeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-15329.4%)
Leading raw performance (+15329.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+1500%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 6071.8% better value per dollar than the GeForce 6600 LE.

InsightGeForce 6600 LEGeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+6071.8%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6600 LE and GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce 6600 LE

The GeForce 6600 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 823 MHz to 888 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6600 LE scores 51 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 15329.4%. The GeForce 6600 LE is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 2.046 TFLOPS (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 888 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 6600 LEGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
51
7,869+15329%
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1152+29%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.046 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+46%
Boost Clock
888 MHz
1665 MHz+88%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
96+71%
56
L1 Cache
96 KB
896 KB+833%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 6600 LEGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6600 LE comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 6600 LEGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
4 GB+1500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
128 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce 6600 LEGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
9.0c
12+33%
OpenGL
2.0
4.6+130%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6600 LE draws 130W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 180mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce 6600 LEGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
130W
75W-42%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Length
180mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
0.4
104.9+26125%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 6600 LE launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce 6600 LE costs 60% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.7 (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 6070.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce 6600 LEGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$30-80%
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$30-60%
$75
Performance per Dollar
1.7
104.9+6071%
Codename
GK104
TU117
Release
August 22 2012
April 23 2019
Ranking
#799
#323