
GeForce 7350 LE vs Mobility Radeon X2500

GeForce 7350 LE
Popular choices:

Mobility Radeon X2500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 7350 LE is positioned at rank 618 and the Mobility Radeon X2500 is on rank 668, so the GeForce 7350 LE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7350 LE
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X2500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 7350 LE is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The GeForce 7350 LE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X2500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon X2500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 7350 LE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 7350 LE | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-10.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+10.8%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 7350 LE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the Mobility Radeon X2500, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 35.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 7350 LE | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+35.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 7350 LE and Mobility Radeon X2500

GeForce 7350 LE
The GeForce 7350 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.

Mobility Radeon X2500
The Mobility Radeon X2500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 7350 LE scores 74 versus the Mobility Radeon X2500's 82 — the Mobility Radeon X2500 leads by 10.8%. The GeForce 7350 LE is built on Pascal while the Mobility Radeon X2500 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X2500). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X2500).
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 74 | 82+11% |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 800+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS+7% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB+200% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 7350 LE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X2500 has 256 MB. The GeForce 7350 LE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X2500) — the GeForce 7350 LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X2500). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1+5% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs MPEG-2,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X2500).
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo (VP1) | — |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9 | MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 7350 LE draws 20W versus the Mobility Radeon X2500's 50W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce 7350 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X2500). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-60% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+131% | 1.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 7350 LE launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Mobility Radeon X2500 launched at $50 and now averages $15. The GeForce 7350 LE costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.4 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 5.5 (Mobility Radeon X2500) — the GeForce 7350 LE offers 34.5% better value. The GeForce 7350 LE is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-40% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.4+35% | 5.5 |
| Codename | GP107 | Broadway |
| Release | February 10 2020 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #597 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











