
GeForce 7350 LE vs GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce 7350 LE
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 7350 LE is positioned at rank #618 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7350 LE
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10533.8% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 7350 LE.
| Insight | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-10533.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+10533.8%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1317.8% better value per dollar than the GeForce 7350 LE.
| Insight | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1317.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 7350 LE and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce 7350 LE
The GeForce 7350 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 7350 LE scores 74 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 10533.8%. The GeForce 7350 LE is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 74 | 7,869+10534% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 896+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS | 2.984 TFLOPS+149% |
| Boost Clock | 937 MHz | 1665 MHz+78% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 56+75% |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 896 KB+273% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 7350 LE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 12+33% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6+119% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 7350 LE) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo (VP1) vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | PureVideo (VP1) | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 7350 LE draws 20W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 115.8% difference. The GeForce 7350 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 167mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-73% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 167mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7 | 104.9+2735% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 7350 LE launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce 7350 LE costs 86.7% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.4 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1317.6% better value. The GeForce 7350 LE is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-80% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-87% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.4 | 104.9+1318% |
| Codename | GP107 | TU117 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #597 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











