
GeForce 8800 GTS vs FirePro M2000

GeForce 8800 GTS
Popular choices:

FirePro M2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8800 GTS is positioned at rank 700 and the FirePro M2000 is on rank 323, so the FirePro M2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8800 GTS
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score and 219.5% more VRAM (1 GB vs 321 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8800 GTS.
| Insight | GeForce 8800 GTS | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+219.5%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 4.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 8800 GTS | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8800 GTS and FirePro M2000

GeForce 8800 GTS
The GeForce 8800 GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 407 points.

FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8800 GTS scores 407 and the FirePro M2000 reaches 426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800 GTS is built on G9x while the FirePro M2000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 640 (FirePro M2000).
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 407 | 426+5% |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 640+186% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8800 GTS comes with 321 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro M2000 has 1 GB. The FirePro M2000 offers 219.5% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.313 GB | 1 GB+219% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 11.1 (FirePro M2000). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.1+11% |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.2+27% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 6+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs UVD 3 (FirePro M2000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000).
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8800 GTS draws 150W versus the FirePro M2000's 43W — a 110.9% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 350W (FirePro M2000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 43W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 65°C-32% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7 | 9.9+267% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8800 GTS launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the FirePro M2000 launched at $300 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 8.5 (FirePro M2000) — the FirePro M2000 offers 4.9% better value. The FirePro M2000 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | $300-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 8.5+5% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Heathrow |
| Release | July 15 2008 | July 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #825 | #710 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















