GeForce 9200M GS
Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
GeForce 9200M GS vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9200M GS vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce 9200M GS vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9200M GS
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 16W instead of 30W, a 14W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌104.1% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 30W vs 16W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9200M GS vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 9200M GS
The GeForce 9200M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.
Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 125 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9200M GS scores 129 and the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 reaches 125 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GS is built on Maxwell while the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 800 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 129+3% | 125 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 800+213% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 0.88 TFLOPS+73% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 160 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9200M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9200M GS has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 carries 512 MB. Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200M GS and 64-bit on the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 0.25 MB (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) — the GeForce 9200M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 10_1 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10_1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9200M GS) vs UVD (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9200M GS draws 16W versus the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400's 30W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce 9200M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 350W (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-47% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 8.1+93% | 4.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9200M GS came in at $100, while the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 launched at $49. On MSRP, Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 2.6 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) — the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9200M GS (2016 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $49-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3 | 2.6+100% |
| Codename | GM108 | M98 |
| Release | March 25 2016 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #864 | #927 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9200M GS and Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
