GeForce 930MX
VS
GeForce 930A

GeForce 930MX vs GeForce 930A

NVIDIA

GeForce 930MX

2016Core: 952 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 930A

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 930MX is positioned at rank 289 and the GeForce 930A is on rank 397, so the GeForce 930MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 930MX

#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
97%
#279
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
679%
#281
616%
#282
614%
#286
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
559%
#287
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
555%
#289
GeForce 930MX
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
100%
#291
GeForce MX250
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#292
Radeon 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#293
GeForce MX330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
98%
#296
Radeon RX 780
MSRP: $499|Avg: $721
96%
#300
GeForce 940MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
94%
#301
GeForce MX130
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
94%
#302
Arc Graphics 130V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
94%
#303
Radeon R5 430
MSRP: $59|Avg: $50
94%
#304
GeForce MX150
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 930A

#387
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1313%
#389
1190%
#390
1187%
#394
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1079%
#395
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1072%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
100%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
99%
#399
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
97%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
97%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#403
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
94%
#404
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
94%
#406
94%
#407
Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
91%
#408
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
91%
#409
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
89%
#410
Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP: $139|Avg: $35
88%
#411
87%
#412
Radeon R7 A365
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 930MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 930A.

InsightGeForce 930MXGeForce 930A
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 930A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 930A holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $25), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 21.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 930MXGeForce 930A
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+21.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 930MX and GeForce 930A

NVIDIA

GeForce 930MX

The GeForce 930MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 17W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,278 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 930A

The GeForce 930A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,241 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 930MX scores 1,278 and the GeForce 930A reaches 1,241 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930MX is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 930A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930MX) vs 384 (GeForce 930A). Raw compute: 0.7834 TFLOPS (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 930A). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 941 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 930MXGeForce 930A
G3D Mark Score
1,278+3%
1,241
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7834 TFLOPS+8%
0.7227 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1020 MHz+8%
941 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
192 KB
192 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 930MXGeForce 930A
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 930MX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 930A has 512 MB. The GeForce 930MX offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce 930MXGeForce 930A
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 930MX) vs 11.0 (GeForce 930A). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 930MXGeForce 930A
DirectX
12 (11_0)+9%
11.0
Vulkan
1.1
1.2+9%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 930MX) vs NVENC 2 (GeForce 930A). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 930MX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 930A).

FeatureGeForce 930MXGeForce 930A
Encoder
None
NVENC 2
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP6)
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 930MX draws 17W versus the GeForce 930A's 33W — a 64% difference. The GeForce 930MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930MX) vs 350W (GeForce 930A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 930MXGeForce 930A
TDP
17W-48%
33W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
75.2+100%
37.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 930MX launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce 930A launched at $150 and now averages $20. The GeForce 930A costs 20% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 51.1 (GeForce 930MX) vs 62.0 (GeForce 930A) — the GeForce 930A offers 21.3% better value. The GeForce 930MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 930MXGeForce 930A
MSRP
$80-47%
$150
Avg Price (30d)
$25
$20-20%
Performance per Dollar
51.1
62.0+21%
Codename
GM108
GM108
Release
March 1 2016
March 13 2015
Ranking
#805
#810