
GeForce 930MX vs GeForce 930A

GeForce 930MX
Popular choices:

GeForce 930A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 930MX is positioned at rank 289 and the GeForce 930A is on rank 397, so the GeForce 930MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 930MX
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 930A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 930MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 930A.
| Insight | GeForce 930MX | GeForce 930A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 930A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 930A holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $25), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 21.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 930MX | GeForce 930A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+21.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 930MX and GeForce 930A

GeForce 930MX
The GeForce 930MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 17W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,278 points.

GeForce 930A
The GeForce 930A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,241 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 930MX scores 1,278 and the GeForce 930A reaches 1,241 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930MX is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 930A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930MX) vs 384 (GeForce 930A). Raw compute: 0.7834 TFLOPS (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 930A). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 941 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce 930A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,278+3% | 1,241 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7834 TFLOPS+8% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1020 MHz+8% | 941 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce 930A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 930MX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 930A has 512 MB. The GeForce 930MX offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce 930A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 930MX) vs 11.0 (GeForce 930A). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce 930A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 930MX) vs NVENC 2 (GeForce 930A). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 930MX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 930A).
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce 930A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP6) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 930MX draws 17W versus the GeForce 930A's 33W — a 64% difference. The GeForce 930MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930MX) vs 350W (GeForce 930A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce 930A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 17W-48% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 75.2+100% | 37.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 930MX launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce 930A launched at $150 and now averages $20. The GeForce 930A costs 20% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 51.1 (GeForce 930MX) vs 62.0 (GeForce 930A) — the GeForce 930A offers 21.3% better value. The GeForce 930MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce 930A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-47% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $20-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.1 | 62.0+21% |
| Codename | GM108 | GM108 |
| Release | March 1 2016 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #805 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












