
GeForce FX 5200LE

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce RTX 2060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce RTX 2060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce RTX 2060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5200LE
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $306 less on MSRP ($43 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅183.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (680 vs 240).
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($43 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌259.4% higher power demand at 575W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅11874.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 24742.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $43 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 575W, a 415W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 680), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce RTX 2060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5200LE
The GeForce FX 5200LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200LE scores 7 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 201528.6%. The GeForce FX 5200LE is built on Rankine while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) with 680 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7 | 14,114+201529% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+1033% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+1525% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz+43% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+267% | 48 |
| TMUs | 680+467% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+1021% | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+3100% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170+467% | 30 |
| Tensor Cores | 680+183% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce FX 5200LE is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5200LE has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200LE and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce FX 5200LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 6 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+3100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+33% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 4.6+207% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: No vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | No | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5200LE draws 575W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 112.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 160W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-10% | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5200LE came in at $43, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5200LE was 87.7% cheaper ($306 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 20100% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200LE (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $43-88% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 40.4+20100% |
| Codename | GB202 | TU106 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #3 | #168 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














