GeForce GT 130M
VS
GeForce G210

GeForce GT 130M vs GeForce G210

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce G210

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 130M is positioned at rank 131 and the GeForce G210 is on rank 290, so the GeForce GT 130M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 130M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
750%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
721%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
712%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
711%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
710%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
706%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
697%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
694%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
688%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
686%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
678%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
676%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
664%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
663%
#85
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
97%
#86
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
95%
#116
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
827%
#131
GeForce GT 130M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#133
Radeon HD 6750
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
99%
#135
Radeon R5 240
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
98%
#136
Radeon R5 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
98%
#137
Radeon HD 8570
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#139
GeForce GT 730
MSRP: $89|Avg: $45
96%
#140
Radeon HD 8400E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
95%
#142
Radeon HD 8400
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
93%
#143
Radeon HD 5750
MSRP: $130|Avg: $25
93%
#145
Radeon HD 8330E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
90%
#146
Radeon HD 8670D
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce G210

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2451%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2354%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2327%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2323%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2318%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
2305%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2276%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2268%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2247%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2241%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2214%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2209%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
2169%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2168%
#275
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2703%
#290
GeForce G210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#291
Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
96%
#292
Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $9
91%
#293
GeForce GTX 260
MSRP: $449|Avg: $449
90%
#294
Radeon HD 8490
MSRP: $99|Avg: $35
90%
#295
Radeon HD 8650D
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
89%
#297
Radeon HDG 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $15
86%
#298
Radeon HD 3870
MSRP: $219|Avg: $15
85%
#299
Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
83%
#300
Radeon HD 6310
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
82%
#301
GeForce GTX 295
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
81%
#302
Radeon HD 4870 X2
MSRP: $550|Avg: $550
80%
#303
Radeon HD 3850 X2
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
80%
#304
Radeon HD 4290
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce G210 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 130M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 130MGeForce G210
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce G210 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 130M and GeForce G210

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130M

The GeForce GT 130M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $79.

NVIDIA

GeForce G210

The GeForce G210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 130M scores 145 and the GeForce G210 reaches 148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 130M is built on Pascal while the GeForce G210 uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130M) vs 384 (GeForce G210). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130M) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G210). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MGeForce G210
G3D Mark Score
145
148+2%
Architecture
Pascal
Pascal
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS
1.127 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
1468 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
144 KB
144 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 130MGeForce G210
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 130M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce G210 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 130M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MGeForce G210
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 130M) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce G210). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MGeForce G210
DirectX
10.1
11.1 (10_1)+10%
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 130M) vs None (GeForce G210). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce G210).

FeatureGeForce GT 130MGeForce G210
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
VP4
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 130M draws 30W versus the GeForce G210's 30W — a 0% difference. The GeForce G210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130M) vs 350W (GeForce G210). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 100.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MGeForce G210
TDP
30W
30W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
70°C-30%
100
Perf/Watt
4.8
4.9+2%