GeForce GT 130M vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 130M is positioned at rank #131 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 130M

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

750%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

721%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

712%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

711%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

710%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

706%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

697%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

694%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

688%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

686%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

678%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

676%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

664%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

663%

#85

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

97%

#86

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

MSRP: $350|Avg: $350

95%

#116

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

827%

#131

GeForce GT 130M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#133

Radeon HD 6750

MSRP: $109|Avg: $109

99%

#135

Radeon R5 240

MSRP: $59|Avg: $10

98%

#136

Radeon R5 340

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

98%

#137

Radeon HD 8570

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

98%

#139

GeForce GT 730

MSRP: $89|Avg: $45

96%

#140

Radeon HD 8400E

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

95%

#142

Radeon HD 8400

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

93%

#143

Radeon HD 5750

MSRP: $130|Avg: $25

93%

#145

Radeon HD 8330E

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

90%

#146

Radeon HD 8670D

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 130M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5326.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 130M.

Insight	GeForce GT 130M	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5326.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+5326.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 130M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 130M and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce GT 130M

The GeForce GT 130M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $79.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 130M scores 145 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 5326.9%. The GeForce GT 130M is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130M) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130M) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT 130M	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	145	7,869+5327%
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	384	896+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+165%
Boost Clock	1468 MHz	1665 MHz+13%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	56+133%
L1 Cache	144 KB	896 KB+522%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 130M	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 130M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 130M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 130M	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 130M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: None vs 1.4. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 130M	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	10.1	12+19%
Vulkan	None	1.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	1	3+200%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 130M) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce GT 130M	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	No	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP3	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 130M draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GT 130M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 130M	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	229mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	70°C	70°C
Perf/Watt	4.8	104.9+2085%