GeForce GT 130M
VS
GeForce Go 7700

GeForce GT 130M vs GeForce Go 7700

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7700

2013Core: 1046 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 130M is positioned at rank #131 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 130M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
750%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
721%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
712%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
711%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
710%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
706%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
697%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
694%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
688%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
686%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
678%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
676%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
664%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
663%
#85
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
97%
#86
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
95%
#116
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
827%
#131
GeForce GT 130M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#133
Radeon HD 6750
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
99%
#135
Radeon R5 240
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
98%
#136
Radeon HD 8570
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#137
Radeon R5 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
98%
#139
GeForce GT 730
MSRP: $89|Avg: $45
96%
#140
Radeon HD 8400E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
95%
#142
Radeon HD 8400
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
93%
#143
Radeon HD 5750
MSRP: $130|Avg: $25
93%
#145
Radeon HD 8330E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
90%
#146
Radeon HD 8670D
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce Go 7700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 130M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 130MGeForce Go 7700
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 130M and GeForce Go 7700

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130M

The GeForce GT 130M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $79.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7700

The GeForce Go 7700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 130M scores 145 and the GeForce Go 7700 reaches 148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 130M is built on Pascal while the GeForce Go 7700 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130M) vs 1,536 (GeForce Go 7700). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130M) vs 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7700). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1085 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MGeForce Go 7700
G3D Mark Score
145
148+2%
Architecture
Pascal
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS
3.333 TFLOPS+196%
Boost Clock
1468 MHz+35%
1085 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
24
128+433%
L1 Cache
144 KB+13%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 130MGeForce Go 7700
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 130M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7700 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 130M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MGeForce Go 7700
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 130M) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7700). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MGeForce Go 7700
DirectX
10.1+12%
9.0c
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
3.3+57%
2.1
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 130M) vs No (GeForce Go 7700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130M) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7700).

FeatureGeForce GT 130MGeForce Go 7700
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
PureVideo
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 130M draws 30W versus the GeForce Go 7700's 230W — a 153.8% difference. The GeForce GT 130M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130M) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MGeForce Go 7700
TDP
30W-87%
230W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
4.8+700%
0.6