GeForce GT 220 vs GeForce 9500 GS
GeForce GT 220
Popular choices:
GeForce 9500 GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 220 is positioned at rank 287 and the GeForce 9500 GS is on rank 644, so the GeForce GT 220 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 220
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9500 GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 220 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9500 GS.
| Insight | GeForce GT 220 | GeForce 9500 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9500 GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9500 GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $49), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 376.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 220 | GeForce 9500 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+376.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 220 and GeForce 9500 GS
GeForce GT 220
The GeForce GT 220 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points. Launch price was $649.
GeForce 9500 GS
The GeForce 9500 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 220 scores 222 and the GeForce 9500 GS reaches 216 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 220 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 9500 GS uses G9x, both on a 65 nm process. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GT 220) vs 224 (GeForce 9500 GS).
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | GeForce 9500 GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 222+3% | 216 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+7% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | GeForce 9500 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 220 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9500 GS has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 220 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | GeForce 9500 GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 220) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9500 GS). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | GeForce 9500 GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.1 (10_0)+10% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 220) vs PureVideo HD (GeForce 9500 GS). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 220) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9500 GS).
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | GeForce 9500 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | PureVideo HD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 220 draws 236W versus the GeForce 9500 GS's 150W — a 44.6% difference. The GeForce 9500 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220) vs 350W (GeForce 9500 GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | GeForce 9500 GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 236W | 150W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9 | 1.4+56% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 220 launched at $69 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce 9500 GS launched at $110 and now averages $10. The GeForce 9500 GS costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.5 (GeForce GT 220) vs 21.6 (GeForce 9500 GS) — the GeForce 9500 GS offers 380% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | GeForce 9500 GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69-37% | $110 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $10-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.5 | 21.6+380% |
| Codename | GT200 | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | June 16 2008 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #802 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 220 and GeForce 9500 GS
