
GeForce GT 230 vs Radeon R5E

GeForce GT 230
Popular choices:

Radeon R5E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 230 is positioned at rank #171 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 230
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 230 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5E.
| Insight | GeForce GT 230 | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 230 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 230 holds the technical lead. Priced at $44 (vs $49), it costs 10% less, resulting in a 14.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 230 | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+14.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($44) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 230 and Radeon R5E

GeForce GT 230
The GeForce GT 230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon R5E
The Radeon R5E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 20 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 315 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 230 scores 323 and the Radeon R5E reaches 315 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 230 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R5E uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 230) vs 512 (Radeon R5E). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 230) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R5E).
| Feature | GeForce GT 230 | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 323+3% | 315 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS+38% | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+13% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 230 | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 230) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5E) — the GeForce GT 230 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 230 | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 230) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R5E). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 230 | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 12 (12_0)+20% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 230) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R5E). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 230) vs H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R5E).
| Feature | GeForce GT 230 | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 230 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5E's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R5E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 230) vs 0W (Radeon R5E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GT 230 | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 15W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 10.8 | 21.0+94% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 230 launched at $44 MSRP and currently averages $44, while the Radeon R5E launched at $0 and now averages $49. The GeForce GT 230 costs 10.2% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.3 (GeForce GT 230) vs 6.4 (Radeon R5E) — the GeForce GT 230 offers 14.1% better value. The GeForce GT 230 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 230 | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $44 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $44-10% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.3+14% | 6.4 |
| Codename | GP108 | Cape Verde |
| Release | May 17 2017 | December 20 2013 |
| Ranking | #641 | #738 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















