GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon HD 7560D

CPU

GPU

GeForce GT 320

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon HD 7560D

2012Boost: 1250 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon HD 7560D Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 320

1 GB 30

470

+4.0%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

Radeon HD 7560D

0.5 GB 200

452

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon HD 7560D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon HD 7560D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 320

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $22 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $101 MSRP).
✅Delivers 32.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.9 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $101 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7560D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 7560D

2012

Why buy it

✅11.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
27.8% HIGHER MSRP
$101 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($101 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 7560D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 320 instead at 470 vs 452, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 320 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 320 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $22 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $101, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 32.9% (5.9 vs 4.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 7560D still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon HD 7560D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 320

The GeForce GT 320 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 470 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon HD 7560D

The Radeon HD 7560D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 452 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 320 scores 470 and the Radeon HD 7560D reaches 452 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 320 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 7560D uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 320) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7560D). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7560D). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon HD 7560D
G3D Mark Score	470+4%	452
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1792+367%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS	2.867 TFLOPS+154%
Boost Clock	1468 MHz+17%	1250 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	112+367%
L1 Cache	144 KB	448 KB+211%
L2 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 320 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7560D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon HD 7560D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 320 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7560D carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 320 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7560D. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 320) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7560D) — the Radeon HD 7560D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon HD 7560D
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 320) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7560D). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon HD 7560D
DirectX	10.1	11.2 (11_0)+11%
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	3.3	4.4+33%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 320) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7560D). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 320) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon HD 7560D).

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon HD 7560D
Encoder	None	VCE 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP4)	UVD 3.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 320 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7560D's 200W — a 147.8% difference. The GeForce GT 320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 320) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7560D). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 175mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon HD 7560D
TDP	30W-85%	200W
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	175mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75	75
Perf/Watt	15.7+583%	2.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 320 came in at $79, while the Radeon HD 7560D launched at $101. On MSRP, GeForce GT 320 was 21.8% cheaper ($22 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.9 (GeForce GT 320) vs 4.5 (Radeon HD 7560D) — the GeForce GT 320 offers 31.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 320 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GT 320	Radeon HD 7560D
MSRP	$79-22%	$101
Performance per Dollar	5.9+31%	4.5
Codename	GP108	Tahiti
Release	May 17 2017	January 31 2012
Ranking	#641	#454

Search GeForce GT 320 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7560D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.