GeForce GT 520 vs GeForce 240M GT
GeForce GT 520
Popular choices:
GeForce 240M GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 520 is positioned at rank 214 and the GeForce 240M GT is on rank 575, so the GeForce GT 520 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 520
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 240M GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 240M GT.
| Insight | GeForce GT 520 | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 240M GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 240M GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $15), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 197.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 520 | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+197.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 520 and GeForce 240M GT
GeForce GT 520
The GeForce GT 520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $159.
GeForce 240M GT
The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 520 scores 323 and the GeForce 240M GT reaches 320 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 520 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce 240M GT uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 520) vs 384 (GeForce 240M GT). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 240M GT). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 323 | 320 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+100% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.825 TFLOPS+102% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz+1% | 1176 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 48+100% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+50% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 520 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 240M GT has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 520 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 520) vs 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0+9% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1+24% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 520) vs None (GeForce 240M GT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 240M GT).
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 520 draws 90W versus the GeForce 240M GT's 33W — a 92.7% difference. The GeForce 240M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 520) vs 350W (GeForce 240M GT). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W | 33W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Legacy |
| Length | 145mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.6 | 9.7+169% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 520 launched at $59 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 240M GT launched at $100 and now averages $5. The GeForce 240M GT costs 66.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.5 (GeForce GT 520) vs 64.0 (GeForce 240M GT) — the GeForce 240M GT offers 197.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $59-41% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $5-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5 | 64.0+198% |
| Codename | GM206 | GM108 |
| Release | August 20 2015 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #425 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 520 and GeForce 240M GT
