GeForce GT 520MX vs Intel UHD Graphics 600

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 520MX

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 600

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts

GeForce GT 520MX vs Intel UHD Graphics 600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 520MX vs Intel UHD Graphics 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 520MX

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 600 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 520MX is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Intel UHD Graphics 600

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $45 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel UHD Graphics 600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 7.2% in PassMark G3D (312 vs 291), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 520MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 520MX makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Intel UHD Graphics 600 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 520MX vs Intel UHD Graphics 600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 520MX

The GeForce GT 520MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 291 points.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 600

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 520MX scores 291 versus the Intel UHD Graphics 600's 312 — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 leads by 7.2%. The GeForce GT 520MX is built on Kepler while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MXIntel UHD Graphics 600
G3D Mark Score
291
312+7%
Architecture
Kepler
Generation 8.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384+100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7427 TFLOPS+84%
0.4032 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
967 MHz
1050 MHz+9%
ROPs
16+433%
3
TMUs
32+33%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 520MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MXIntel UHD Graphics 600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 520MX has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 520MX gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 520MX and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 600.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MXIntel UHD Graphics 600
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MXIntel UHD Graphics 600
DirectX
11.0
12+9%
Vulkan
None
1.3
OpenGL
4.0
4.6+15%
Max Displays
1
3+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 520MX) vs QSV (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs QSV. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520MX) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 600).

FeatureGeForce GT 520MXIntel UHD Graphics 600
Encoder
No
QSV
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
QSV
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 520MX draws 50W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 600's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 55°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MXIntel UHD Graphics 600
TDP
50W
15W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
55°C-21%
Perf/Watt
5.8
20.8+259%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 520MX came in at $45, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 launched at $0. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 600 was 100+% cheaper ($45 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.5 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 600) — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 600 (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 520MXIntel UHD Graphics 600
MSRP
$45
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
6.5
Infinity
Codename
GK107
Broadwell GT2
Release
January 9 2013
September 5 2014
Ranking
#792
#703

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.