GeForce GT 520MX vs Intel UHD Graphics 600
GeForce GT 520MX
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 520MX is positioned at rank #434 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 520MX
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 520MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 520MX | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 520MX and Intel UHD Graphics 600
GeForce GT 520MX
The GeForce GT 520MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 291 points.
Intel UHD Graphics 600
The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 520MX scores 291 versus the Intel UHD Graphics 600's 312 — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 leads by 7.2%. The GeForce GT 520MX is built on Kepler while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 291 | 312+7% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7427 TFLOPS+84% | 0.4032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 1050 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 16+433% | 3 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 520MX comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 has 0 MB. The GeForce GT 520MX offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6+15% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 520MX) vs QSV (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs QSV. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520MX) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 600).
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | QSV |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | QSV |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 520MX draws 50W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 600's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 55°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 15W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 55°C-21% |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8 | 20.8+259% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 520MX launched at $45 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 costs 100+% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.1 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 600) — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $45 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK107 | Broadwell GT2 |
| Release | January 9 2013 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #792 | #703 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 520MX and Intel UHD Graphics 600
