GeForce GT 520MX
Radeon R1E
GeForce GT 520MX vs Radeon R1E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 520MX vs Radeon R1E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 520MX vs Radeon R1E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 520MX
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R1E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.
Radeon R1E
2023Why buy it
- ✅30.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $45 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 520MX vs Radeon R1E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GT 520MX
The GeForce GT 520MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 291 points.
Radeon R1E
The Radeon R1E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 301 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 520MX scores 291 and the Radeon R1E reaches 301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 520MX is built on Kepler while the Radeon R1E uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 128 (Radeon R1E). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon R1E). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 291 | 301+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+200% | 128 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7427 TFLOPS+32% | 0.5632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 2200 MHz+128% |
| ROPs | 16+300% | 4 |
| TMUs | 32+300% | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 520MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R1E leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 520MX has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R1E carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 520MX gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 520MX and 64-bit on the Radeon R1E. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 2 MB (Radeon R1E) — the Radeon R1E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 12 (Radeon R1E). Vulkan: None vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.5+13% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 520MX) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R1E). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520MX) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,HEVC (Radeon R1E).
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 520MX draws 50W versus the Radeon R1E's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R1E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 350W (Radeon R1E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 15W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8 | 20.1+247% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 520MX came in at $45, while the Radeon R1E launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon R1E was 100+% cheaper ($45 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.5 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs Infinity (Radeon R1E) — the Radeon R1E offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R1E (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $45 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK107 | Dragon Range |
| Release | January 9 2013 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #792 | #843 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 520MX and Radeon R1E
