GeForce GT 520MX vs Quadro FX 3500M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 520MX

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3500M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 520MX vs Quadro FX 3500M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 520MX vs Quadro FX 3500M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 520MX vs Quadro FX 3500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 520MX

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 3500M

2008

Why buy it

  • 38.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $45 MSRP).
  • 278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 3500M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 38.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5.2% in PassMark G3D (306 vs 291), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 520MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 520MX makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 3500M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 520MX vs Quadro FX 3500M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 520MX

The GeForce GT 520MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 291 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3500M

The Quadro FX 3500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 306 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 520MX scores 291 versus the Quadro FX 3500M's 306 — the Quadro FX 3500M leads by 5.2%. The GeForce GT 520MX is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 3500M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3500M). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500M).

FeatureGeForce GT 520MXQuadro FX 3500M
G3D Mark Score
291
306+5%
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+60%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7427 TFLOPS+19%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 520MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3500M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MXQuadro FX 3500M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 520MX has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3500M carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 520MX gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 520MX and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500M.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MXQuadro FX 3500M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 3500M). OpenGL: 4.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MXQuadro FX 3500M
DirectX
11.0+22%
9.0c
OpenGL
4.0+90%
2.1
Max Displays
1
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 520MX) vs None (Quadro FX 3500M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs VP1. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520MX) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 3500M).

FeatureGeForce GT 520MXQuadro FX 3500M
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
VP1
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
MPEG-2,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 520MX draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 3500M's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The GeForce GT 520MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MXQuadro FX 3500M
TDP
50W-74%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
5.8+262%
1.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 520MX (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GT 520MXQuadro FX 3500M
MSRP
$45
Codename
GK107
GT200B
Release
January 9 2013
November 11 2008
Ranking
#792
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.