
GeForce GT 520MX

Quadro FX 3500M
GeForce GT 520MX vs Quadro FX 3500M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 520MX vs Quadro FX 3500M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 520MX vs Quadro FX 3500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 520MX
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 3500M
2008Why buy it
- ✅38.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $45 MSRP).
- ❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 520MX vs Quadro FX 3500M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 520MX
The GeForce GT 520MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 291 points.

Quadro FX 3500M
The Quadro FX 3500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 306 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 520MX scores 291 versus the Quadro FX 3500M's 306 — the Quadro FX 3500M leads by 5.2%. The GeForce GT 520MX is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 3500M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3500M). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Quadro FX 3500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 291 | 306+5% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+60% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7427 TFLOPS+19% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 520MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3500M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Quadro FX 3500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 520MX has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3500M carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 520MX gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 520MX and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500M.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Quadro FX 3500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 3500M). OpenGL: 4.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Quadro FX 3500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0+22% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.0+90% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 520MX) vs None (Quadro FX 3500M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs VP1. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520MX) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 3500M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Quadro FX 3500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VP1 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | MPEG-2,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 520MX draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 3500M's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The GeForce GT 520MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Quadro FX 3500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-74% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8+262% | 1.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GT 520MX (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 520MX | Quadro FX 3500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $45 | — |
| Codename | GK107 | GT200B |
| Release | January 9 2013 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #792 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















