GeForce GT 520MX vs Mobility Radeon HD 5165

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 520MX vs Mobility Radeon HD 5165 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 520MX vs Mobility Radeon HD 5165: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 520MX

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $4 less on MSRP ($45 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

2010

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
8.9% HIGHER MSRP
$49 MSRPvs$45 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 6.5 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $45 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 520MX is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (291 vs 284), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 520MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 520MX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4 cheaper on MSRP at $45 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 11.6% (6.5 vs 5.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 520MX vs Mobility Radeon HD 5165 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 520MX

The GeForce GT 520MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 291 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 284 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 520MX scores 291 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5165 reaches 284 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 520MX is built on Kepler while the Mobility Radeon HD 5165 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 5165). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 5165).

Feature	GeForce GT 520MX	Mobility Radeon HD 5165
G3D Mark Score	291+2%	284
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7427 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+51%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	32 KB	80 KB+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 520MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 520MX	Mobility Radeon HD 5165
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 520MX and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 5165.

Feature	GeForce GT 520MX	Mobility Radeon HD 5165
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 5165). OpenGL: 4.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 520MX	Mobility Radeon HD 5165
DirectX	11.0+9%	10.1
OpenGL	4.0+21%	3.3
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 520MX draws 50W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 5165's 50W — a 0% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 5165). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 520MX	Mobility Radeon HD 5165
TDP	50W	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	5.8+2%	5.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 520MX came in at $45, while the Mobility Radeon HD 5165 launched at $49. On MSRP, GeForce GT 520MX was 8.2% cheaper ($4 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.5 (GeForce GT 520MX) vs 5.8 (Mobility Radeon HD 5165) — the GeForce GT 520MX offers 12.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 520MX (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GT 520MX	Mobility Radeon HD 5165
MSRP	$45-8%	$49
Performance per Dollar	6.5+12%	5.8
Codename	GK107	Broadway
Release	January 9 2013	January 7 2010
Ranking	#792	#846

Search GeForce GT 520MX on Amazon

Search Mobility Radeon HD 5165 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.